Access to safe, affordable housing remains one of the most significant challenges globally, and the scale of the challenge is only expanding as urbanisation and population growth rapidly accelerate1. South Africa's unique history means cities are geographically segregated, with low-income, less safe areas on the periphery and safer, more established suburbs located closer to the city centre2. Large government housing programmes, including the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP)3 and the Breaking New Grounds (BNG) programme4, have built 3,3 million houses as of 20185. Unfortunately, this will never achieve the scale needed to solve the housing crisis and because of financial constraints, progress has largely halted in the last few years. Newer programmes have focused more on inner city developments, often through private or third party developers, but this comes with added challenges such as neglecting development in the peripheral townships. Multiple solutions across different spheres of the housing spectrum are needed to address the shortage, and one of those is the provision of affordable rental accommodation in township areas where people can live safely in good environments within the communities they grew up in, rather than moving elsewhere.
The township construction context is generally very informal, poorly managed and inefficient in use of resources. Given that most backyard rental flats do not go through municipal approval nor comply with minimum quality requirements, there is a high prevalence of fire safety issues, a lack of formal connection to sewerage and plumbing, limited legal electricity connections that result in a higher risk of electricity-related accidents, poor security, a lack of natural sunlight, and poor air quality. These factors affect the overall health and well-being of tenants6.
In the last decade, a large amount of planning has been focused on the development of affordable or social housing, usually near the city centres. In Cape Town, only 1 of 11 social housing projects announced in 2017 have actually been complete7 and with the City of Cape Town having a waiting list of 367,592 people as of January 2023, the City itself has estimated that at the current rate of progress it will take over 70 years to erase the backlog8. Only 6 500 social housing units are currently planned across 50 land parcels.
Our rental flats are studio apartments that are designed to incorporate a double bed, and include well-designed functional kitchen spaces, built-in cupboards and workstations in the lounge area with natural light and ventilation. The en-suite bathrooms have toilets, basins and showers connected to formal plumbing and sewerage, efficient water heaters as well as prepaid water and electricity meters.
Our rental flats are built according to National Building Regulations based on location, and align with the City of Cape Town’s vision for responsible densification for the future10. The flats have superior physical properties compared to traditional backyard rental flats, such as greater strength, better thermal retention and improved acoustic qualities due to the environmentally responsible materials used. For the tenant looking for accommodation in the township, our flats compare favourably with other options. While there are many backyard rental flats available, given the high demand and the fact that most do not meet the required building standards, our flats are very popular. Our homeowners, together with our homeowner relationship managers, are able to fill vacant flats almost immediately and our vacancy rate is less than 3%.
The typical Bitprop tenant is a young professional such as a nurse, police worker, call centre agent or a student with an average age of 31 years old. They earn, on average, well below the upper limit of ZAR 22 000 (USD 1 158) defined as requiring affordable housing11. They are attracted to our flats because of the quality of design, the support provided and their location relative to major transport hubs and retail spaces. The features of our flats and the location provide additional benefits through reduced transport costs and lower energy expenses for tenants.
Bitprop's consistent output of affordable housing addresses a serious problem affecting South Africa and the world; an estimated 3 billion people will live in sub-standard housing by 203012. Improved affordable housing can also have an indirect effect that creates huge value. A homeowner in iLitha Park mentioned that she regularly gathers recyclable materials from her tenants to pass on to a local recycler in the community. This neighbour sells it to buyback centres and the influx of Bitprop tenants has inadvertently provided her with a boost in income that supports her and her family.
Average rent charged
ZAR 3800 (USD 212) excluding water and electricity
Amenities
Parking
DSTV connection ready for tenant's account
Wi-Fi connection ready for tenant's account
Individual water and electricity meters per tenant
En-suite bathrooms with showers
Kitchen and bedroom cupboards
Average size
18 sqm
Deposit required
1 month’s rent in advance
Submitted for municipal approval
100% of builds submitted to municipality for approval
Average rent charged
ZAR 2 500 - 3 500 (USD 132 - 184)
Amenities
Stand-alone rooms have shared bathroom facilities, while studio flats usually have en-suite bathrooms.
Often, flats share informal electricity connections and some have hot water available13.
Average size
12 sqm - 18 sqm
Deposit required
The deposit amount varies from flat to flat. Some flats require no deposit, others require references and others require one month’s deposit or more
Submitted for council approval
Majority do not submit to municipality for approval
Benefits
Challenges
Benefits
Challenges
Bitprop develops rental flats in Cape Town in the affordable rental accommodation segment, addressing a part of the affordable housing shortage. Each apartment has key infrastructure installed, including hot and cold water, prepaid water and electricity meters, a sewerage connection, a satellite TV connection, Wi-Fi access conduits, burglar guards and a security gate. This affordable housing addresses numerous SDGs: No Poverty (1); Zero Hunger (2); Quality Education (4); Decent Work & Economic Growth (8); Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (9); and Partnership for the Goals (17).
76% of Cape Town’s population earns below ZAR 22 000 (USD 1 158) per month, but only 34% of the current housing supply addresses this income bracket, which includes the majority of our tenants. Our flats are ideal for individuals or couples who are young professionals and who prefer to live in the township, either because it is where they grew up, or to save on rent costs. Access to transport, convenience of location and affordability are key factors.
Bitprop has developed 506 backyard studio rental flats, addressing the affordable housing shortfall and assisting to meet the targets of the City of Cape Town, which has delivered on only 1 of 11 social housing projects planned 5 years ago. In 6 years Bitprop, a small, privately funded start-up, has built almost 10% of what the City of Cape Town governmental body has built since 1997.
Had our flats not been built, alternatives available would most likely have been in the same areas, but more informal and more likely to have safety and security issues, poorer health environments and be less conducive to economic well-being. Without Bitprop’s 502 new flats, the competition for quality affordable housing in these areas for this segment of tenants would be greatly increased and more tenants would have to settle for lower-quality living, or pay higher rent levels in other areas.
Evidence risk is low because despite the general lack of data in the segments we work in, renting as a concept is fairly ubiquitous and behaves similarly across segments. Our tenants are young professionals who are familiar with most rental concepts, even if these aren’t always followed by landlords in a township environment. We are thus able to analyse rental behaviour with the same models as in the formal sector, where there is a huge amount of research available. Unexpected impact risk is medium, given that we are operating in a data-scarce environment and because our model of co-management with the homeowner introduces some complexity to the relationship with the tenant. As a whole, it works very well, but there is some uncertainty as to how this might adapt in new areas or rental environments.
Reference